Retain Top Talent

Most hiring managers are highly biased to lean toward extroverted candidates. I wrote a LinkedIn article a few years ago that introverted candidates were doomed to fail in interviews due to this biased mentality. Some of my very best hires have been with introverts.

This article dives a little deeper into how introverts are successful. After reading this article, does it change your interview bias? How would you pose the interview questions differently to an introvert vs. an extrovert?

Another survey on employee engagement - pretty consistent data.

80% not engaged.

64% considering looking for a job

82% want more recognition

90% want more feedback

What I don't understand is that some of these issues are very simple to fix and are basically low hanging fruit to immediately boost retention and employee engagement.

Why do most employers, especially smaller businesses, feel it's not worth the time to give more feedback, recognition, and learning/development?

I liked this article about igniting passion in your workforce. I am not sure I would use the word passion - I might replace it with focused, energized, engaged, self-motivated. When these elements occur, employees tend to show high levels of personal initiative and proactivity.

When missing, people tune out, lean outward, find other ways to become self-actualized than at work, and generally act bored and disinterested (not engaged).

One of my constant efforts as a high school girls basketball coach and management consultant around hiring/retention is to continually be taking the pulse, and developing actuion plans to keep the passion high.

What do you do frequently with your team beyond reviewing daily to-do activities?

There was one major point in this article I found most useful.  With younger generational workers you must have frequent career discussions and provide a clear roadmap of promotions, increased responsibility, and how their job will evolve as the company moves forward.

Not having these discussions at least once a quarter leaves you vulnerable to great performers leaving to go to companies that are willing to have these conversations.

How do you as a manager engage in career discussions with members of your team? Have you ever been trained formally in how to have these conversations?

You probably know from my posts that I am a huge advocate of kindness, grace, appreciation, and gratitude in the workplace. I'm going to suggest that this concept is so far beyond most executives and CEOs that it could be coming from outer space.

The current generation of executives and many managers are indoctrinated from their bosses and mentors with the need to yell, scream, be angry, and show little mercy. They are rude, inconsiderate and don't really care about people in their actions. in most companies, there is very little appreciation, grace, and gratitude.

The challenge for most executives and managers is how to balance the need for execution and attainment of goals with caring about people through appreciation, grace, and gratitude.

Without the appropriate balance, it will be very tough to keep high performers in your organization in the coming years.

How do you do it?

An interesting study and article showing one of the top elements of concern to employees is work/life balance. Unfortunately, the article doesn't provide any greater detail on defining what's an appropriate work/life balance. Does that mean I get time off for Doctor's appointments or you'll not call me at the last minute to work a weekend shift?

I did pick that a couple of the most important factors for younger workers is challenging work and learning opportunities. Duh! Still amazed how many companies don't focus and discuss this issue with their employees.

If you've been following my posts, you know that I am a huge proponent of showing praise, appreciation, gratitude, and recognition. Here is an article that highlights 6 simple and easy to implement tactics for improving retention.

I'm a huge fan of metrics and KPIs. I liked this article's focus around HR/retention/engagement KPIs. What do you measure? Are you holding your managers accountable for making great hiring decisions and sustaining/retaining high performing teams?

Interesting perspective on empathy in the organization as being a key element of employee engagement. the striking statistic to me was the gap between the CEOs perception of being an empathetic organization and employee perception.

Interesting perspective on the issue of loyalty by the younger generations. Are you seeing these issues pop up in your organization?

Interesting article distinguishing between recognition and appreciation. Most companies have some form of minimal recognition initiatives, yet very few focus on the element of appreciation. Is your lack of appreciation and gratitude undermining your employee engagement and ability to retain to top performers?

I've been recommending this idea for over a decade now. Let's kill the traditional sadistic exercise of annual performance reviews and move to Continuous Peformance Management of monthly one-to-ones and regular feedback. Not only will see performance soar, but you'll also see motivation and employee engagement explode.

Do you agree these are some of the most important criteria for a good boss? Are there any others you might add to the list?

Good short perspective on employee engagement in Chief Executive Magazine. Bottom line - formalizing communication made a big difference. I assume it was along the lines of communicating vision, mission, purpose, recognition, and feedback.

It could also be along the lines of teaching/training managers to be coaches - how to listen, how to give praise, how to give feeback.

This article borders on the comical and addresses the few simple reasons why engagement tactics and strategies fail all the time to drive substantial improvements.

Number ONE issue - most companies and executives are unwilling to do the hard work.

I draw the comparison to both playing a sport and hiring.

My experience as a high school girls basketball coach is that most players are unwilling to put in the hard work to aspire to something greater - whether it is the ability to move up a team level or just make more free throws in the next game. This is the basic message by Kobe Bryant. Nothing earth-shattering about this message - it's just a continuation of what you did in high school.

The second point - most companies don't make substantial improvements in hiring because they are unwilling to do the hard work of defining success for every job, shaking the bushes for the best candidate, and investing substantial resources and time to improve the interview process.

It's like the wrecking ball is just around the corner when we become complacent, lazy, and unwilling to do hard work.

My take away here is that employees really want investment in training and development. Do you develop written personal development plans for every plan every year? Are your competitors doing this retention strategy? Have you trained your managers in how to have this career/training/development discussion with their teams?

Inc Magazine recently published this article on the myths of employee engagement. I think they may have missed the mark - not that I would disagree with a major business publication.

I don't believe companies substitute a fun work environment for true employee engagement. I do believe many CEOs and HR execs put millennials in a box. Finally,  many of my clients have weak or non-existent reward and recognition programs.

When should you start focusing on engagement issues - should it be when you've lost 10% of your best talent to your competitors in the next few years?

Good summary of the Gallup and Gartner research on employee engagement. Not only does the article present scary stats on the actual percentages of employee engagement, but it also lists a number of areas to focus on to improve employee engagement.

If you're looking to improve employee engagement, retention, happiness, and satisfaction - - this list is also my top list for reading material. the authors are all outstanding  - especially the first one - Patrick Lencioni whose book was originally titled the 3 elements of a miserable job. Great reading.

To this list I would add Gallup's book It's All About the Manager.

Counter-Intuitive article about employee engagement. Author claims current tactics have not moved the needle on employee engagement. I think the author is out of touch. For companies that have implemented effective employee engagement programs, they have moved the needle dramatically on NPS, engagement scores, employee satisfaction, customer satisfaction, turnover, and retention.

The problem is that so few companies have implemented effective programs, the needle appears in aggregate not to move very much.

The tactics of employee engagement are very basic, yet most companies don't want to make the effort. Simple things like listening, coaching, autonomy, praise, recognition, development, training, challenges - all basic fundamental work motivations -- and most companies are failing miserably at execution,

It's not the tactics that are wrong, it's the issue of poor execution on change management.

What if this was a trait we looked for in interviews - enthusiasm, energy, positive, friendly, helpful. Do we measure it, score it, role play for it, and seek to understand when we are doing references.

The attitude of these folks is contagious. They are the epitome of Gallup's definition of an engaged employee.

Just imagine what would happen if you added a few more of these folks to your team.

The big question I've got is why your hiring process is not focused around finding, attracting, and recruiting these magical employees?

I like the idea proposed by the article on linking performance management and engagement. There is no question performance goes up as engagement goes up. Although the article cites the HBR on this subject, and makes a number of key points, it lacks specific recommendations on how to link them together.

Wondering why your top sales folks have 2-3 offers sitting on the table, and why your competitors feel so confident that they can attract your most successful reps - this article dives into the issues that could mean the difference between keeping the Pareto group and being stuck with a team of average people.

Great teams bond together through activities that encourage overcoming shared pain and fears and learning about each other. It doesn't happen naturally in the course of sitting in closed-off cubicles. You have to force it to occur by putting employees in situations where they must work together intimately as a team, learn to "get each other's back", and rely on each other. All l high performing teams use team-building exercises to improve the way they work together. Have you considered the results you could get if your team was hi-performing?

What a great story that reflects praise, gratitude, appreciation, and recognition. A letter to the parents. Duh! Why haven't I thought of that as a tactic around motivation? How many of you have written a note to an employee's parents?